https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-026-00668-9
Research
Influence of the majority group on individual judgments in online spontaneous conversations
InfoLab, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, SE-752 37, Uppsala, Sweden
a
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
29
September
2025
Accepted:
17
May
2026
Published online:
21
May
2026
Abstract
This study investigates how the majority group influences individual judgment formation and expression in anonymous, spontaneous online conversations. Drawing on theories of social conformity and anti-conformity, we analyze everyday dilemmas discussed on social media. First, using digital traces to operationalize judgments, we measure the conversations’ disagreement and apply Bayesian regression to capture shifts of judgments formation before and after the group’s exposure. Then we analyze changes in judgment expression with a linguistic analysis of the motivations associated with each judgment. Results show anti-conformity behaviors: individuals preserve the majority’s positive or negative orientation of judgments but diverge from its stance, with persuasive language increasing post-disclosure. Our findings highlight how online environments reshape social influence compared to offline contexts.
Key words: Reddit / Opinion dynamics / Online social media / Communication norms / Social conformity
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-026-00668-9.
Handling Editor: Kristina Lerman
© The Author(s) 2026
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
